Main Article Content


Innovation public policy has a vital role in influencing the competitive capacity of companies and is strongly associated with their ability to innovate and the way they are organized. As important as the technological and the organization of work is the social dimension, namely, involvement, participation, and commitment of the workforce, as these are, par excellence, factors that contribute to creating added value and differentiation for companies. In this sense, the concept of innovation depends on an integrated vision between the human dimension and the other multiple dimensions that innovation can assume. Public policies besides the goal of creating a more modern and competitive business and industrial context, also are focused on the development of the workforce, not only in digital skills but also in workplace skills. This type of skills contributes to creating a more innovative context and a culture of innovation. This article goal is to make a global overview of the innovation concept and innovation skills. Also, explicitly, the research aimed to identify the critical skills and disruptive digital skills in the sphere of innovative public policies. To this end, a literature review was conducted, and an online survey explored the main critical skills for the future and the disruptive digital skills contributing to the definition and implementation of public innovation policies.


Dynamic Skills Innovation Skills Digital Skills Innovation Public Policies

Article Details


  1. Mohelska, H., & Sokolova, M. Management Approaches For Industry 4.0 - The Organizational Culture Perspective. Technological & Economic Development of Economy, 24(6), 2018, pp. 2225–2240.
  2. Schallock, B., Rybski, C., Jochem, R., & Kohl, H. Learning Factory for Industry 4.0 to provide future skills beyond technical training. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, n.d., pp. 27–32.
  3. Mehta, B. S., & Awasthi, I. C. Industry 4.0 and Future of Work in India. FIIB Business Review, 8(1), n.d., pp. 9.
  4. Tunnicliffe, H. Industry X.0 - The Next Stage: What’s coming, and why the process industries will have to be more nimble. TCE: The Chemical Engineer, (920), 2018, pp. 36–39.
  5. Habanik, J., Grencikova, A., & Krajco, K. The Impact of New Technology on Sustainable Development. Engineering Economics, 30(1), 2019, pp. 41–49.
  6. Sung, T. K. (n.d.). Industry 4.0: A Korea perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 132, 40.
  7. Freddi, D. Digitalisation and employment in manufacturing. AI & Society, 33(3), n.d., 393.
  8. dos Santos, M., Vianna Jr., A. S., & Le Roux, G. A. C. Programming skills in the industry 4.0: are chemical engineering students able to face new problems? Education for Chemical Engineers, 22, n.d., pp. 69.
  9. Caruso, L. Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes? AI & Society, 33(3), 2018, pp. 379–392.
  10. Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., & Ngai, W. T. E. Quality management in the 21st century enterprises: Research pathway towards Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 2019, pp. 125–129.
  11. Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4.0 –The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, n.d., pp. 129–134.
  12. Arena, D., Perini, S., Taisch, M., & Kiritsis, D. The Training Data Evaluation Tool: Towards a unified ontology-based solution for industrial training evaluation. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, n.d., pp. 219–224.
  13. Büth, L., Blume, S., Posselt, G., & Herrmann, C. Training concept for and with digitalization in learning factories: An energy efficiency training case. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, n.d., pp. 171–176.
  14. Louw, L., & Walker, M. Design and implementation of a low cost RFID track and trace system in a learning factory. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, n.d., pp. 255–260.
  15. Pérez-Pérez, M. P., Gómez, E., & Sebastián, M. A. Delphi Prospection on Additive Manufacturing in 2030: Implications for Education and Employment in Spain. Materials (1996-1944), 11(9), n.d., pp. 1500.
  16. Kasapoğlu, Ö. A. Leadership and Organization for the Companies in the Process of Industry 4.0 Transformation. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7(3), 2018, pp. 300–308.
  17. Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), n.d., pp. 104–114.
  18. Messaadia, M., Ouchani, S., & Louis, A. A Recursive K-means towards trade-off between PLM Competences, Positions, and Offers. Procedia Computer Science, 134, n.d., pp. 297–302.
  19. Gruber, H. Proposals for a digital industrial policy for Europe. Telecommunications Policy, 43(2), 2019, pp. 116–127.
  20. Niculescu, G. Implementing Policies For Innovative Entrepreneurship. Annals of the Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu-Letters & Social Sciences Series, n.d., pp. 14.
  21. Lee Perkins, B., Garlick, R., Wren, J., Smart, J., Kennedy, J., Stephens, P., Perkins, B. L. The Life Science Exchange: a case study of a sectoral and sub-sectoral knowledge exchange programme. Health Research Policy & Systems, 14, 2016, pp. 1–10.
  22. Hukampal, S. S., & Bhowmick, B. Innovation Network for Entrepreneurship Development in Rural Indian Context: Exploratory Factor Analysis. International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, 13(4), 2016, pp.1.
  23. Gastrow, M., & Oppelt, T. Big science and human development - what is the connection? South African Journal of Science, 114(11/12), 2018, pp. 33–39.
  24. Ellison, S., & Allen, B. Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1), n.d., pp. 267.
  25. Corradini, M., Costantini, V., Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. Interacting innovation investments and environmental performances: a dynamic impure public good model. Environmental Economics & Policy Studies, 17(1), 2015, pp. 109–129.
  26. Clark, J., & Bailey, D. Labour, work and regional resilience. Regional Studies, 52(6), 2018, pp. 741–744.
  27. Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., & Janssen, M. Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: An exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 20(1), 2015, pp. 19–34.
  28. Brenner, M. H. Small networks, evolution of knowledge and species longevity: Theoretical integration and empirical test. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, and Nonequilibrium and Complex Phenomena, 104, n.d., pp. 314–322.
  29. Resele, L. Impact Of The National Innovation System On Innovation. Journal of Business Management, (9), 2015, pp. 97–106.
  30. European Commission. The Green Book on Innovation. Brussels: EU, 1996.
  31. Kovács, I., Inovação organizacional, Curso de Formação Avançada em ‘Políticas e gestão da Inovação’, ISEG-UTL, 2002.
  32. Hague, J., Work Organisation: old wine in new bottles?, The Work Institute, The Nottingham Business School, The Nottingham Trent University, 2000.
  33. Pettigrew, A. e Fenton, E. (ed.), The innovating organization, Londres, SAGE, 2000.
  34. Baker WE, Sinkula JM., Market orientation, learning orientation, and product innovation: delving into the organiza¬tion's black box. Journal of Market-Focused Management 5(1):, 2002, pp 5-23.
  35. Cooper, J. R., A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation. Management Decision, 36(8), 1998, pp. 493-502.
  36. Gjerding, A.N., Organisational innovation in the Danish private business sector (Druid Working Paper No.96-16). Aalborg: Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University, 1996.
  37. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., and Pavitt, K., Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change, Third edition, Wiley, 2005.
  38. Gronhaug, K. & Kaufmann, G. eds, Innovation: a cross-disciplinary perspective. Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1988.
  39. Padmore, T., Schuetze, H. & Gibson, H., Modeling systems of innovation: an enterprise-centered view. Research Policy, 26(6), 1998, pp. 605-24.
  40. Chesbrough, H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
  41. Chen Y-S, Lai S-B, Wen C-T., The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 67(4), 2006, pp. 331-339.
  42. Van de Ven AH, Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sciences 32(5), 1986, pp. 590-607.
  43. Sousa MJ, Martins JM., Innovation competencies to potentiate global trade. In Handbook of Research on Strategic Innovation Management for Improved Competitive Advantage, Jamil GL, Ferreira JP, Pinto MM, Pessoa CR, Xavier A (eds). Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2018, pp. 429-442.
  44. Helmer, O. Analysis of the future: The Delphi method (No. RAND-P-3558). RAND Corp Santa Monica, CA, 1967.
  45. Sousa, M.J. Skills Trends In The Sphere Of Innovation Public Policies, Modern Sciences, Political Sciences, 6th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2019, Vienna, Austria.